Adrian Morgan wrote:
>
> That statement could be taken - and I'm worried that maybe it's /meant/
> to be taken - as sarcasm targetted at the notion that I was posting to
> show how things "ought to be done".
It's obvious to me that it wasn't.
> I will sometimes spend *hours* staring at text, especially if it's
> something I've written myself, "playing" with the words. It's not that I
> particularly enjoy this: it's just a natural, instinctive,
> brain-in-neutral response.
Are you familiar with Dissociated Press?
--
There is / one art || John Cowan <jcowan@...>
no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein