Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: SoCal vowels (was Re: sending mail to the list)

From:SuomenkieliMaa <suomenkieli@...>
Date:Thursday, May 3, 2001, 17:55
--- J Matthew Pearson <pearson@...> wrote:
> SuomenkieliMaa wrote: > > > > This is an interesting hypothesis. So do you > have > > > the same contrast between > > > "could" (more rounded) and "good" (less > rounded)? > > > We should test this > > > systematically: > > > If Steg's guess is right, then the vowels in > column > > > A should all sound the > > > same, and the vowels in column B should all > sound > > > the same, and the vowels in > > > column A should sound different from the vowels > in > > > column B... > > > > > > A B > > > put book > > > took look > > > could good > > > soot rook > > > foot crook > > > should > > > shook > > > cook > > > hook > > > > Definitely list A initial consonants require a > > stronger aspiration (except perhaps, soot), > whereas > > list B initial consonants do not. As far as the > > vowel/s, though, they must be the same. > > Sorry, I should have been more explicit. This test > is intended > *only* for speakers of American English who claim to > produce a > contrast between the vowels in "put" and "book". > This test, I > suspect, will not apply to the majority of English > speakers > (myself included). > > Matt
Hi Matt, ...I am American...and from my Midwest-accented American English, 'put' and 'book' would both hold the same "U" sound. I do not agree about the word "soot" though. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/

Replies

J Matthew Pearson <pearson@...>
Frank George Valoczy <valoczy@...>