Re: A DISTURBING proposal! (was Re: Personal langs and converse of aux)
From: | Andrew Chaney <adchaney@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, February 7, 2001, 4:59 |
On Tuesday, February 6, 2001, at 06:30 PM, JörgRhiemeier wrote:
> > 2.)it's designed to be an
> > excellent "first" language for my kids.
>
> You are really going to do THAT??? Have your children grow up with a
> language that no-one else speaks outside their core family? I consider
> this MONSTROUSLY unadvisable, as it might result in SEVERE mental
> development disorders. (I am not a pyschologist, but common sense alone
> tells me that this cannot be good for your children.)
I do hope you intend to teach them a real language as well.
I wouldn't think it would do harm for them to grow up
bilingual (natlang + conlang)? But conlang only would
not be good. Any psychologists on the list?
Andy
http://www.ucs.louisiana.edu/~adc7593/
adchaney@louisiana.edu