Re: Just a Little Taste of Judean
From: | Steg Belsky <draqonfayir@...> |
Date: | Sunday, April 11, 1999, 7:00 |
On Sat, 10 Apr 1999 22:37:33 -0400 Nik Taylor <fortytwo@...> writes:
>Steg Belsky wrote:
>> So far, i don't think it'll have cases.
>> Nouns are descended from Latin's genitive case (like Spanish's are
>from
>> the accusative).
>That seems unlikely to me. The genitive was lost very early on in
>Latin
>evolution. Genitive is an oblique case. Typically, when cases are
>lost, the core cases (that is, nominative and accusative or ergative
>and
>absolutive, as the case may be) provide the remaining form. Most
>probable would be either accusative remaining, as in French, Spanish,
>Portuguese, etc., or nominative, as in Italian, Romanian, etc. In
>fact,
>I don't know of any examples, from any families, where a non-core case
>was the last remaining.
Well, this is my Fat-Chance Rationalization:
Judean is a Latin-based language placed over a Semitic substrate. In
Hebrew and Aramaic, there's a _construct state_, which is the opposite of
the genitive case.
Hebrew: (garden-of) (animals)
Latin: (garden) (of-animals)
So, in Hebrew, the form of the word which is used in the second part of a
construct case is the *normal* form. So, by another
substrate/second-language mix up, the genitive case becomes equated to
the second part of the construct case, and through that, to the "normal
word".
RL Reason: i wanted to be different :)
-Stephen (Steg)
"God punishes - humans take revenge."
___________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html
or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]