Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Latin help

From:Eric Christopherson <rakko@...>
Date:Friday, September 7, 2007, 3:56
On Sep 6, 2007, at 6:29 PM, Mark J. Reed wrote:

> On 9/6/07, caeruleancentaur <caeruleancentaur@...> wrote: >> I don't see "doth" as emphatic, but rather as an archaic present >> tense: >> I do, thou dost, he doth, etc. > > It's not the fact that it's "doth" instead of "does" that makes it > emphatic, but the fact that it's there at all. Why "doth magnify" > instead of just "magnifieth"? In modern English, at least, the use of > "do" as an auxiliary in a positive statement is an emphatic device.
_Do_ before another verb was not always emphatic in English. Sorry, I don't have any references for that, but I've read it.

Reply

Dirk Elzinga <dirk.elzinga@...>