Re: The Forbidden Expariment

Paul Bennett wrote:
>
> Alex C.>>>>>>
> I have a new version of the FE (Forbidden Experiment). I wonder whether
> any of you has thought about teaching his/her conlang to his/her baby
> (apart from the national language, of course). I wonder if any of you
> has decided to achieve a "different" family in this way. I can see my
> son asking if he can go out with girls... in lojban!! (for example)
> <<<<<<
>
> That's a very good point.  I know there was a thread (ages ago) about the best
> language(s) to talk to pets in, and I think either Irina or Mia may have
> mentioned conwords used to/by their children.  I may be wrong.
>
        I think you're right, especially reagrds to pets. Irina, Mia, tell us
again. :)

> The language acquisition FE has occured (unintentionally) to a greater or lesser
> degree many times.  It appears that without any human contact, lone children
> will not make their own language, but (i.e.) twins in language-sparse situations
> will tend to (at the very least) extend their language with conwords (and
> congrammar?).
>
        Generally the grammar is pidginized as far as I know. See the movie
_Nell_, a pretty good performance of Jodi Foster BTW.

> I don't know much about twins (or other n-tuplets) in a completely language-free
> environs, but my own opinion (desire?) is that they'd definately produce
> something.  ISTR some 19th century guy thought that they'd "naturally" speak
> Sanskrit(?), but I don't recall what experimental evidence he had.
>
        He thought it would be Hebrew IIRC, because it was the language of the
Genesis...

--
        Christophe Grandsire

        Philips Research Laboratories --  Building WB 145
        Prof. Holstlaan 4
        5656 AA Eindhoven
        The Netherlands

        Phone:  +31-40-27-45006
        E-mail: grandsir@natlab.research.philips.com