From: | Philip Newton <philip.newton@...> |
---|---|
Date: | Monday, August 13, 2007, 7:51 |
On 8/13/07, Eric Christopherson <rakko@...> wrote:> Someone on another link pointed this out -- it appears to be a > language that tries to adhere to what's reconstructed for PIE, but > with a lot of words taken from more modern languages to fill in > lexical gaps. > > http://www.dnghu.org/Fascinating! And somebody clearly put a *lot* of work into that. Cheers, -- Philip Newton <philip.newton@...>