> On 8/12/07, Eric Christopherson <rakko@...> wrote:
> > Someone on another link pointed this out -- it appears to be a
> > language that tries to adhere to what's reconstructed for PIE, but
> > with a lot of words taken from more modern languages to fill in
> > lexical gaps.
> >
> >
http://www.dnghu.org/
>
> Clearly they did not consult Shemspreg
> (
http://wiki.frath.net/Shemspreg). They could have saved themselves
> quite a bit of time and trouble had they done so :-).