Re: The Conlanger Code v1.1
From: | Yoon Ha Lee <yl112@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, February 6, 2001, 20:32 |
On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, taliesin the storyteller wrote:
Wow. Um, I guess I'm
CM/ED/O v1.1 lh cN:R:H a+++ x n22:1 !B* A-- E? L? N2.5 Ic/v k++++ ia--:+
p+ s+ m+ o P S--- Chevraqis or Chihon (in progress)
For things like Esperanto or Loglanging there seems to be no real
category for "indifferent, haven't done it so I can't dislike it" and
"been there, done that."
Are we allowed to know "fractional" numbers of natlangs? I can read
French pretty well but my conversational sucks. I can speak
basic/conversational Korean but my writing/reading sucks, etc.
Also, where *are* these archives to which people refer? :-p
YHL