Re: New H/G lang?
From: | R. Nierse <rnierse@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, October 12, 1999, 14:33 |
----------
> Van: Nik Taylor <fortytwo@...>
> Aan: Multiple recipients of list CONLANG <CONLANG@...>
> Onderwerp: Re: New H/G lang?
> Datum: dinsdag 12 oktober 1999 1:49
>
> Ed Heil wrote:
> > I was under the impression that "Glottalic" and "Ejective" were two
> > terms for the same phenomenon -- a consonant produced with glottalic
> > egressive initiation. What's the distinction?
>
> Ejective is a type of glottalic. Glottalic means using glottalic
> airstream, it also includes implosives, which are glottalic *ingressive*
I used a different definition of glottalic.
When I said glottalic I meant 'consonant followed by glottal stop'.
I made this distinction because in Yucatec there is a minimal pair this
way.
Maybe the above definition is better.
What about ejective nasals and sonorants and sibilants?
They cannot simply be ejective, because the airstream is still there, even
though they function that way in a phonology.