Re: Non-humanoid langs

Hi!

Simon Clarkstone <simon.clarkstone@...> writes:
> On 4/28/05, Henrik Theiling <theiling@...> wrote:
>...
> > > Not really.  I don't want it to be too cumbersome.  ...
> >
> > I must protest!  Qthyn|gai is not cumbersome! :-)
> Oops, sorry!
No problem! :-)

>...
> (lack of redundancy), and its admittedly ridiculously-closely-packed
> phoneme-space (ANADIEW: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xoo>).
Yes, awesome! :-)

>...
> This lang (if I get very far) will have redundancy, and (when
> "spoken") will reside on top of a TCP/IP-like layer ...
Haha!  That sounds interesting. :-)

But think about other protocols, too, otherwise the addressing
might become a problem. :-)

**Henrik