Re: Sexual terminology [was Re: Blowjobs and pant legs in Dutch]

En réponse à SuomenkieliMaa <suomenkieli@...>:

>
> BTW, just a personal note, it's a bit discouraging
> that a *conculture* would hold views as that of
> Phalera.
Why? A conculture doesn't mandatorily reflects the views of its author. Think
of Irina, whose conculture is anything but Orthodox Christian.

  What is so dirty and unclean about gaiety,
> anyhow?  Hmm, to each his own (chaqu'un a son gout,
> non Christophe?)!
>
:)) Personnally I've never understood the "cleanness" of heterosexuality :))) .
No insult intended, but just showing that everything is a matter of point of
view (in the literal sense).

Christophe.

http://rainbow.conlang.free.fr

Take your life as a movie: do not let anybody else play the leading role.

Replies