Re: Moten's way of naming colours
From: | Matt Pearson <mpearson@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, May 25, 1999, 18:56 |
>> Well, as I said, here is the way we name colours in Moten.
>>
>> Colours in Moten have no name by themselves. There is only the word
>'va':
>> colour, which can be used in compounds to name colours, after the colour of
>> some known objects.
The Tokana colour-term system is pretty boring:
has "white"
kote "black"
sane "red"
lune "blue"
kulhe "green"
laite "yellow"
aihne "gold, amber"
lohne "brown"
hiem "light grey, blue-grey"
hemak "dark grey"
These terms are mostly of unknown origin, except for "sane", which is
obviously related to "san" = "blood" (the connection to French "sang"
is purely accidental, I swear!). Also, "laite" is probably related
to "lai" = "light, brilliance", and "lohne" is probably derived from
"lo-", an old root meaning "tree" (the modern word for tree is
"palahta").
(Also, any of you who are familiar with Tolkien's languages will
recognise "lune" as out-and-out plagiarism - one of the few examples
of such in Tokana.)
Matt.
------------------------------------
Matt Pearson
mpearson@ucla.edu
UCLA Linguistics Department
405 Hilgard Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1543
------------------------------------