Re: conculture issues [cross-posted]

Tony Harris wrote:

> > (a lot of interesting comments about conculture postings on conlang)
>
> I have recently subscribed to the World-Building list and I definitely
> feel like it isn't the forum for the kind of conlang-heavy conculture
> discussions that we're talking about here.  While the list itself can
> have some interesting stuff, I do agree with the comment that it can
> get *very* detail oriented, such as the recent multi-message thread
> about the process of horse domestication in North America and how that
> would/should/could influence specific elements of a hypothetical
> culture.  Quite interesting in its own right, but a lot of bandwidth
> for those of us who aren't really into that level of detail.
Probably my foult, after it originated on a posting on Hangkerim (my
conculture).  But I have become aware of the differences of topics.
World-building seams to provide me (and any other conculturer) on the
technical stuff of making our conworlds more feasibel or credible... but
not for discussing the culture itself.  I'm also subscribed to conculture
and I hope to post there some of the interesting details of the Hangkerim
culture: philosophy of life, religion, dairy life and all those thinks that
are not exactly conlang related.

-- Carlos