Re: A question and introduction
From: | John Cowan <jcowan@...> |
Date: | Thursday, June 13, 2002, 21:47 |
Andy Canivet scripsit:
> Interesting - I don't know much about Lojban, but it sounds as if the
> "scalarity" of the negation really depends on context. Although the most
> obvious conclusion from "I see a non-cat" is that I see something which is
> not a cat but which is near enough to a cat for me to describe it with
> reference to "cat" and not some other object <gasp>. However, couldn't my
> toaster, or really any extant object other than a cat be a non-cat?
Yes, if you can hypothesize a sufficiently whacky scale that has
both cats and toasters on it.
> negating the quality of whiteness (adjective), rather than the object
> itself.
In Lojban nouns, verbs, and adjectives are all one class, so it's
really "I see a non- white:object": "white" is a noun.
--
John Cowan <jcowan@...> http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith. --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_