Phonology of a Whistle-Lang (was: Sound changes)
From: | Steg Belsky <draqonfayir@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, August 27, 2002, 16:43 |
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 09:59:15 -0400 "H. S. Teoh" <hsteoh@...>
writes:
> 85 tones! Hmm that could make for an interesting conlang. I will
> probably
> add 3 more tones to that, and then we can have a pianolang. :-P
> T
-
ZJZJZW! (a greeting)
Actually, recently i've been thinking about a whistle language that could
be written in the Latin alphabet without needing crazy digraphs or
diacritics.
Here's what i've come up with:
Whistle-Lang has both voiceless and voiced phonemes. It is based on a
three-tiered tone system of High, Middle, and Low. All phonemes
(whistlemes?) should take around the same amount of time to
pronounce/produce; therefore the flat tones can be 'long' by being
repeated.
Here are the phonemes, with their orthography:
(since they all have pretty much the same place of articulation, they're
categorized by style)
Flat:
j = L
i = M
f = H
Half-Rising:
p = LM
d = MH
Half-Falling:
q = ML
b = HM
Dipping:
y = MLM
u = HMH
Hopping:
n = LML
h = MHM
Full-Falling:
m = HL
Full-Rising:
w = LH
The voiced equivalents of all these whistles are written with a preceding
|z|, hence |zh| is a voiced MHM whistle, and |i| is a voiceless M
whistle. Or, you could have the voiced whistles be the orthographic
default, and mark the voiceless ones with |s|; or maybe it would be
better to mark all of the for voicingness with |s| and |z|... I'm not
sure yet.
I picked the letters for the orthography based on their visual
characteristics for representing the whistle tones.
-Stephen (Steg)
"there is darkness all around us;
but if darkness *is*,
and the darkness is of the forest,
then the darkness must be good."
~ song of the BaMbuti in troubled times