Re: THEORY: unergative
From: | J Y S Czhang <czhang23@...> |
Date: | Sunday, February 22, 2004, 19:38 |
::be-'mused look at FrenchConnexion X-change::
In a message dated 2004:02:22 03:33:30 PM, christophe.grandsire@FREE.FR
writes:
>En réponse à Philippe Caquant :
>
>>I recently discovered, to my utter despair, that a
>>whole horde of linguistic concepts I hadn't reckoned
>>upon were howling under my city walls.
Ack! ::does bestest Scoobydo imitation:: *Roh Ruh!*
Barbaric hordes of linguistic sappers o_0??
>Hehe, this list is a goldmine for anyone ready to learn new things in
>linguistics :)) .
Sappers again I say.
Wonder if there are any linguistic snipers...
>> I feel the same as physicists when they
>>discovered that there were some anti-neutrons,
>>anti-protons, anti-electrons, plus some Higgs-bosons
>>and three dozens of even more suspicious characters
>>around.
>
>LOL.
Lol as in Dutch or what? And don't look at me, I am not a "suspicious
character" ;) I am just a lil quarky...
>>[...] Maybe I'm wrong too ? But if I burst into the saloon
>>and yell "I shot the sheriff !", looks to me that
>>there wasn't any theme and the whole sentence is the
>>rheme ?
>
>Indeed. The theme can be absent, or refer to the whole context. It can
>stay unexpressed. Only the rheme is necessary in any sentence.
[...]
In a message dated 2004:02:22 03:33:30 PM, christophe.grandsire@FREE.FR
writes:
>If Basque did as you wrote it, it would mean the subject of an intransitive
>sentence would be in the same case as the *subject* of a transitive
>sentence, and by definition this would mean the language is accusative
>:)) .
[...]
>Not at all, you're mixing things that don't fit together.
Got linguistic anti-matter?
Linguistic anti-matter bomb anyone? ;)
--- *DiDJiBuNgA!!* Hang Binary,baby...---
Hanuman "Stitch" Zhang, ManglaLanger (mangle + manga + lang)
Language[s] change[s]: vowels shift, phonologies crash-&-burn, grammars
leak, morpho-syntactics implode, lexico-semantics mutate, lexicons explode,
orthographies reform, typographies blip-&-beep, slang flashes, stylistics
warp... linguistic (R)evolutions mark each-&-every quantum leap...
...languages are "naturally evolved wild systems... So language does not
impose order on a chaotic universe, but reflects its own wildness back." - Gary
Snyder
"Some Languages Are Crushed to Powder but Rise Again as New Ones" -
a chapter on pidgins & creoles, John McWhorter,
_The Power of Babel: A Natural History of Language_
= ¡ gw'araa legooset caacaa !
¡ reez'arvaa. saalvaa. reecue. scoopaa-goomee en reezijcloo ! =
[Fight Linguistic Waste!
Save, Salvage, Recover, Scavenge and Recycle!]
Reply