Re: OT: passport languages
From: | Tim May <butsuri@...> |
Date: | Saturday, August 30, 2003, 21:34 |
David Barrow wrote at 2003-08-30 16:18:02 (-0500)
> Andreas Johansson wrote:
[..]
> >
> >Asterisks meant to indicate footnote usually go behind stuff - one'd
> >expect "... in Standard English* when ...". A prefixed asterisk, in
> >linguistics contexts, usually indicates an unattested form - I was wondering
> >where you were pulling some sort of joke re: the existence of a "Standard" English.
> >
> >
> I should have put it after, but then it should be Standard* English
> shouldn't it? I'm referring to this particular variety of English.
>
> David Barrow
>
Well, either would be acceptable, but the fact that you capitalized
"Standard" suggest that "Standard English" is to be taken as a compound,
so an asterisk after "English" would be interpreted as having scope
over the entire noun phrase "Standard English" rather than just
"English".