Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Gender (was: LANGUAGE LAWS)

From:Mathias M. Lassailly <lassailly@...>
Date:Friday, October 23, 1998, 5:13
Ray wrote :

At 6:01 am +0000 22/10/98, Mathias M. Lassailly wrote:
> >Nik wrote : > ........ > >> Well, I don't think that these polysynthetic types *are* older than > >> "modern" types. Your example of "animal-cow" is essentially a > >> gender-marker (animal gender). > > > >Gender means that one of the two parts is sub-ordinated in meaning, which > >would not the case where 'animal' is the 'cow' only when associated with > >'cow' and 'cow' is that animal only when associated with 'animal'.
This was my argument :-| Gender
> >classifiers are a much more 'scientific' way of ordering the world into > >species :-) > > Nah - there are many languages that do categorize their nouns into several > genders and words like 'animal' may indeed be just such a gender marker. >
And that was a play on words :-)
> I really cannot see how, e.g. the Bantu gender markers are a more > scientific way of ordering the world. > > > > > When such classifiers become mandatory, > >> and spread to other words in the sentences (e.g., adjectives, verbs, > >> pronouns), then they become genders. > >> > > > >Gender is a sexual classifier. > > With respect, this is nonsense.
I don't ask for respect, only moderation. The Bantu languages have strict gender
> marking but one thing they do _not_ distinguish is sexual difference. The > 3rd person pronoun, e.g. has quite a few different forms for the different > gender agreements, e.g. the words for "he/ she/ it" in Xhosa are: > > Gender Sing. plural > No.1 yena bona > No.2 wona yona > No.3 lona wona > No.4 sona zona > No.5 yona zona > No.6 lona > No.7 bona > No.8 kona >
So those 8 categories do not classify items in the world into big families through specific logics now forgotten ? :-)
> But nowhere is "she" differentiated from "he"! > > (Note the Xhosa pronouns are the emphatic, disjunctive forms. Meanings of > pronouns are normally conveyed by various bound morphemes) > > I assume we are using 'gender' with its original and proper linguistic > meaning and not in the way it is, IMO regrettably, now so often used as a > euphemism for 'sex'. > > Ray. > > > > > > > > > but it does not distinguish between 'he' and 'she'! > >
I think I got it by now. Mathias ----- See the original message at http://www.egroups.com/list/conlang/?start=17653 -- Free e-mail group hosting at http://www.eGroups.com/