Re: OT: interestin' factoids (mostly language-related)
From: | Nik Taylor <fortytwo@...> |
Date: | Saturday, August 5, 2000, 4:31 |
"Thomas R. Wier" wrote:
> That is, of course, not strictly linguistic. By itself, <?> only
> represents gesturing and such.
True, but then again, "O!" isn't properly speaking a sentence either.
But, I wasn't really being serious anyways with that.
--
"Their bodies did not age, but they became afeared of everything and
anything. For partaking in any action at all could threaten their
precious and ageless bodies! ... Their victory over death was a hollow
one."
ICQ: 18656696
AIM Screen-Name: NikTailor