Re: Montanian
From: | Andreas Johansson <and_yo@...> |
Date: | Sunday, September 23, 2001, 16:34 |
Joe wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: joe
> To: CONLANG@LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
> Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2001 1:12 PM
> Subject: Re: Montanian
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Adam Walker" <dreamertwo@...>
> To: <CONLANG@...>
> Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2001 5:48 AM
> Subject: Re: Montanian
>
>
> > >From: joe <josephhill@...>
> > >Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 22:40:32 +0100
> > >
> > >
> > > > joe wrote:
> > > > > (montanian for woman is translated as "Breasted Man")
> > > >
> > > > Interesting! What's "Man" then, in the sense of "adult male
>human"?
> > > > Just the plain root "Man"? Are there *any* words that
>differentiate
> > > > between male and female? What about "father" and "mother"?
> > > >
> > >
> > >Person/man is khu. There are no single words that differentiate.
>Tallak khu
> > >means woman,when necessary to differentiate and lhallud is parent.
>Tallak
> > >lhallud is only used when it is absoloutly necessary to differentiate
> > >between father and mother.
> > >
> >
> > So the default gender on all words is male? there are no "female"
>words in
> > the language making all feminine references highly marked. Is there a
> > concultural reason for this extreme bias?
> >
> > Adam
> >
> >
> >
>
> Actually, male's are dominant in most societies. (Just wondering, can
>you give me any examples of the reverse? maybe a language too?) So it is
>logical.
Traditional New Caledonian society is matriarchical. Same for some Amazon
basin peoples.
Andreas
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
Reply