From: | daniel andreasson <danielandreasson@...> |
---|---|
Date: | Wednesday, April 3, 2002, 15:40 |
Maija Åstrand skrev:> Yep. Like, if you want to say that something's on the > table, the word "table" must be in this case.Aha! That's "Prepositional". If you mean that the case in itself doesn't indicate the "on", but you have to have a preposition (or postposition for that matter) and then a case to indicate that the preposition belongs to that word. Like: There is a dog *on* the table:PREP.> Another problem here is that most of the time I do not > know at all if something is a case or derivation - but > I can live with that. (That said, I now think this is a > clitic morphem [clite?], not a case... "a negative clite"?)I'm pretty sure the word is "clitic". David Crystal defines it as "a form which resembles a word, but which cannot be used on its own as a normal utterance because it is structurally dependent on a neighbouring word in a construction. Examples include the contracted forms of _be_ in English (I'm, he's) and the pronoun _je_ in French, which must always be followed by a verb." I think you can throw in the genitive _-s_ in Swedish as well. Like in "Mannen som bor i lägenheten därborta*s* hund." Lit. "The man who lives in the apartment over there*'s* dog." ||| daniel -- danielandreasson @ swipnet.se | http://home.swipnet.se/escape
Matthew Kehrt <matrix14@...> |