Re: Phaleran voices: active, passive, antipassive, etc.
From: | Thomas R. Wier <artabanos@...> |
Date: | Friday, September 7, 2001, 8:06 |
"Thomas R. Wier" wrote:
> > Could this be interpreted as "The children were looked at"?
>
> Ag! You're right: it's ambiguous if you do not explicitly mention the demoted
> patient, and that won't do. What's more, I should have realized that antipassives
> usually are marked explicitly and distinctly from other voices. Here's a possible
> fix: the antipassive uses the the same detransitive suffix -(a)bro- as the passive,
> but it also uses a verbal prefix su-/sw-. E.g.
Changed my mind. Here's the allomorphy for the antipassive prefix:
/su/ -->
[s]: / stops and fricatives not homorganic in place of articulation. Voiced segments
devoice after it:
gethabronni skethabronni
see.DETR.3PlPfRe.S > ANT.see.DETR.3PlPfRe.S
'they were seen' 'they saw'
dmatabrolþa stmatabrolþa
carry-off.DETR.1PlExProsRe > ANT.carry-off.DETR.1PlExProsRe
'we will be carried off' 'we will carry off'
[sw]: / vowels:
aðneiþnubronni swaðneiþnubronni
sit.CAUS.DETR.3PlPfRe.S > ANT.sit.CAUS.DETR.3PlPfRe.S
'they were seated' 'they seated'
[su]: / s and z:
saihabrotentha susaihabrotentha
avoid.DETR.NEG.3SgPfIr > ANT.avoid.DETR.NEG.3SgPfIr
'he/she would not have been avoided' 'he/she would not have avoided'
[]: / hr, r, r| :
hrontabroltâ? rontabroltâ?
leave.DETR.1PlExProsIr.Ques > ANT.leave.DETR.1PlExProsIr.Ques
'are we not going to been left behind?' 'are we not going to leave behind?'
(the distinction between /hr/ and /r/ is neutralized in this context, but not uvular /r|/)
===================================
Thomas Wier | AIM: trwier
"Aspidi men Saiôn tis agalletai, hên para thamnôi
entos amômêton kallipon ouk ethelôn;
autos d' exephugon thanatou telos: aspis ekeinê
erretô; exautês ktêsomai ou kakiô" - Arkhilokhos
Replies