| From: | Tristan McLeay <kesuari@...> |
|---|---|
| Date: | Saturday, May 3, 2003, 2:13 |
John Cowan wrote:>Stone Gordonssen scripsit: > > > >>>Hehe. We call it "anadewism" here in the List... >>> >>> >>"anadewism"? Derived from ?? >> >> > >A Natlang Already Does it Even Worse -ism. > >Is a language that has an anadewism in it an anadewist? If a natlang evolves such that now it contains an anadewism, is it anadewising? :) -- Tristan <kesuari@...>
| Andreas Johansson <andjo@...> |