From: | Andreas Johansson <andjo@...> |
---|---|
Date: | Saturday, May 3, 2003, 16:03 |
Quoting Tristan McLeay <kesuari@...>:> John Cowan wrote: > > >Stone Gordonssen scripsit: > > > > > > > >>>Hehe. We call it "anadewism" here in the List... > >>> > >>> > >>"anadewism"? Derived from ?? > >> > >> > > > >A Natlang Already Does it Even Worse -ism. > > > > > Is a language that has an anadewism in it an anadewist? If a natlang > evolves such that now it contains an anadewism, is it anadewising? :)Nope, it's anadewizing ... Andreas
Tristan McLeay <kesuari@...> |