From: "Tristan McLeay" <kesuari@...>
> Andreas Johansson wrote:
>
> >>Is a language that has an anadewism in it an anadewist? If a natlang
> >>evolves such that now it contains an anadewism, is it anadewising? :)
> >
> >Nope, it's anadewizing ...
[snip]
> Next you'll be telling me that /"&n@dZuaizIN/ simply doesn't cut it for
> the pronunciation, either.
I would be saying /%{n@dI"wAjziN/, mainly because 'anadewize' just feels like it
should be stolen from some Greek word *anadeuizw ('soak'?) > anadevize.
*Muke!
--
http://www.frath.net/