Re: CONLANG pitch accent (was Re: NATLANG: pitch accent question)
From: | Tristan McLeay <kesuari@...> |
Date: | Saturday, May 3, 2003, 17:11 |
Andreas Johansson wrote:
>>Is a language that has an anadewism in it an anadewist? If a natlang
>>evolves such that now it contains an anadewism, is it anadewising? :)
>>
>>
>
>Nope, it's anadewizing ...
>
>
Zeds are over-rated. Zees sound like cees (especially the way Americans
say them... I could understand a British-style dialect distinguishing
Zee and Cee happily, but Americans?[1]) and should join the queue: sea
and see are already there.
[1]: You mightn't realise it, but either you use less /z/s than we do,
our you make your /z/ differently from us, so it has the affect of
making it look like the distinction between /z/ and /s/ isn't as strong
as it could be.
Next you'll be telling me that /"&n@dZuaizIN/ simply doesn't cut it for
the pronunciation, either.
--
Tristan <kesuari@...>
Replies