Quoting Stone Gordonssen <stonegordonssen@...>:
> >I can't see any a priori reason why the causes of male homosexuality
> should
> >necessarily the same as those of female homosexuality. The article
> asserted
>
> Would you assert the same about male and female heterosexuality?
Depends on what level of explanation we're working on. If we're talking about
why a certain individual is heterosexual rather than homo- or bisexual, well
obviously yes. I couldn't very well argue that not being hetero might have
gender-specific reasons while being it does not have? If we're talking about
why heterosexuality exists, then the reason is the same for both genders -
transmission of genes to the next generation.
> >that there is no correlation between a woman's sexual orientation and
> the
> >number of her elder siblings of either gender.
>
> Or it's yet another case of "lesbians don't get AIDS".
I don't see what you are getting at hear. As you seem inclined to disbelieve
their data on men, I certainly do not expect you to consider their data on
women more reliable.
Andreas