Re: Lunatic Survey
From: | some Cook, Himes, or Concepcion <dennis@...> |
Date: | Saturday, October 3, 1998, 19:15 |
Sorry this response is so late.
Pablo Flores <fflores@...> wrote:
> How does Gladilatian have no verbs?
> I tried to do this some time ago in Tomoulini Ganmaa, an humanoid alien
> language. It worked, to a certain extent. In TG, words are usually
> marked with suffixes indicating their function in the statement.
>=20
> Is this how Gladilatian works?
No. In Gladilatian a word's function in the statement is determined=
by
part of speech and word order.
Every Gladilatian sentence is a copula, i.e. it contains an implicit
"to be". Thoughts expressed as verbs in English are treated a number of
ways in Gladilatian. For "I am building this." Gladilatian says, "I [am]
the builder of this." ("Fmu mzanrau nvet"). For "It is changing," "It =
[is]
a changing one." ("Hou xvau"). For "I see you," "I [am] the user of =
sight
directed at you." ("Fmu mzanapu hyaehna u."), with "user of" and =
"directed
at" expressed by prepositions. The equivalent of tense markers are =
attached
to nouns (usually), so "I will change." would be literally "The future I
[is] a changing one" ("Srefmu xvau."). (There is no syntactic =
distinction
between nouns and pronouns.)
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D
Dennis Paul Himes <> dennis@himes.connix.com
homepage: http://www.connix.com/~dennis/dennis.htm
Gladilatian page: http://www.connix.com/~dennis/glad/lang.htm
=20
Disclaimer: "True, I talk of dreams; which are the children of an idle
brain, begot of nothing but vain fantasy; which is as thin of substance =
as
the air." - Romeo & Juliet, Act I Scene iv Verse =
96-99