Re: CHAT: Of high and noble things ...

Andreas sekalge:
>Are the identifications "high"="noble" and "low"="vulgar, common" more
or
>less universal, or just a feature of Western traditions?
They're logical anywhere that powerful people strut and weak people bow
and scrape. They're logical wherever fortresses are built on hills if
possible and farmers are poor. Thus, they'd be logical in China as much
as in Hungary.