Re: Concocted early 16th Century English
From: | Benct Philip Jonsson <bpj@...> |
Date: | Thursday, November 13, 2003, 15:33 |
At 18:40 12.11.2003, Roger Mills wrote:
>"Needs" is certainly obsolete, a deliberate archaism, in 20th C. speech and
>writing. In the 19th C. it may have been merely "literary"--
William Morris used "needs" liberally
in his romances, which seems to indicate
that it was pretty archaic already by then.
Of course WM would avoid "perforce" in most
contexts, it not being 'northern' enough.
/BP 8^)
--
B.Philip Jonsson mailto:melrochX@melroch.se (delete X)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~__
A h-ammen ledin i phith! \ \
__ ____ ____ _____________ ____ __ __ __ / /
\ \/___ \\__ \ /___ _____/\ \\__ \\ \ \ \\ \ / /
/ / / / / \ / /Melroch\ \_/ // / / // / / /
/ /___/ /_ / /\ \ / /'Aestan ~\_ // /__/ // /__/ /
/_________//_/ \_\/ /Eowine __ / / \___/\_\\___/\_\
Gwaedhvenn Angeliniel\ \______/ /a/ /_h-adar Merthol naun
~~~~~~~~~Kuinondil~~~\________/~~\__/~~~Noolendur~~~~~~
|| Lenda lenda pellalenda pellatellenda kuivie aiya! ||
"A coincidence, as we say in Middle-Earth" (JRR Tolkien)