Re: CPA - An ASCII-based phonetic alphabet
From: | Christophe Grandsire <christophe.grandsire@...> |
Date: | Monday, November 19, 2001, 12:17 |
En réponse à Lars Henrik Mathiesen <thorinn@...>:
> > Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 23:58:50 +0100
> > From: Boudewijn Rempt <boud@...>
> >
> > Frankly, I don't care either way - and since Unicode has become
> mandatory
> > for mail clients since January 2000 (a 'must' according to some rfc
> I
> > forgot the number of), you might as well use real IPA.
>
> [ËθɪsɪsËÉÊ ÌlɪÉkÉÌËpÉ«ÉɪÉÌsËtÊ°ÉsθÉn].
>
> > If you can find some way to key it in, I'll find a way to display
> > it.
>
> [dɪɾɪɾËwÉk]?
>
<sob> I can see nothing but a bunch of diacritical E characters. I read my e-
mail through a web-based interface that can read nothing more than Latin-1 text
(and I find it OK, since it prevents strange e-mails containing HTML and
viruses or whatever to bring their poisonous content to my computer). I could
read them with Outlook Express, but every other day it cannot read my mailbox
(like today), so it's pretty useless.
So please, stick to Latin-1. If you want to use Unicode, direct us to webpages.
My computer can read Unicode webpages with nearly no problem.
Christophe.
http://rainbow.conlang.free.fr
Take your life as a movie: do not let anybody else play the leading role.