difference in conlangs
From: | daniel andreasson <daniel.andreasson@...> |
Date: | Friday, April 13, 2001, 14:29 |
One thing that is good that I've noticed lately is that
having three (at least somewhat) conlangs at once is
really practical. I've had only Rinya for three years,
but now that I have Seimi and Nakiltipkaspimak too, I
never get tired of conlanging. If I get tired of Rinya
I can always work on Pimak. It helps that they're very
different too.
Rinya:
* Active
* OVS [PAT - VERB - AGT]
* Analytic/Agglutinating
* A priori
* Qyenya-like phonology
* Dependent-marking
Seimi:
* Accusative
* VSO
* Inflecting
* A posteriori
* Celtic-like phonology
* Head/Dependent-marking
Nakiltipkaspimak:
* Ergative
* SVO
* Polysynthetic / Noun-incorporating
* A priori
* Small phoneme inventory [13 phonemes only]
* Head-marking
See how different they are? I just thought about how neat
that is and thought I'd share my newly found happiness.
Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!! :)
||| daniel
--
<> Daeselaidh goddi mis giall! <> daniel.andreasson@telia.com <>
<> Lwodadh giall! <> www.geocities.com/conlangus <>