Re: "write him" was Re: More questions
From: | Stephen Mulraney <ataltanie@...> |
Date: | Monday, December 1, 2003, 19:18 |
Garth Wallace wrote:
> Stephen Mulraney wrote:
>
>> John Cowan wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I think the other posting about handles has merit as well: pots have
>>> two handles by default, whereas pans have one or none at all.
>>
>>
>>
>> I think two-handledness provides a useful prototype for thinking of pots,
>> but I've certainly seen, and use, pots with one handle (of the kind found
>> on a pan - a long "stem"). These tend to be smaller pots, though, since
>> a single stem handle become increasingly unmanageable as the size of the
>> - and the weight of its contents when full - increases. I have a fairly
>> large, heavy pot that has one handle, and it's not something that could
>> be mistaken for a (say, frying) pan.
>
>
> Those are called saucepans.
They are called that by some(*), which is what this thread has been about.
(*) To be more precise: not by all.
Saucepans..! Cupboards..!
Sassenachs!!
:)
--
Stephen Mulraney ataltane@ataltane.net http://ataltane.net
Time is a great teacher, but unfortunately it kills all its pupils
-- Hector Berlioz