> >
http://www.srv.net/~ram/syntax.html
> >
> > ... particulary noting how in English the "gap"
> > construction is preferred, and how inflexible and
> > ambiguous it can be in comparison to Farsi,
> > which was my original comparison. Sheesh.
>
> Yes, I know about that -- but go back and read what
> I said in my post. I said that the sentence *could* be
> grammatical, if you think of it as an example of
> topicalization.