Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: TERMS: Umlaut-Ablaut

From:Raymond Brown <ray.brown@...>
Date:Monday, November 15, 1999, 6:01
At 7:13 pm -0500 14/11/99, Padraic Brown wrote:
[....]
> >Are there o and e umlaut at all then? What kind of umlaut is >"Goethe", or is it? I always thought it was, but would appreciate >clarification.
German 'oe' (or 'o' with an umlaut) in native words is caused by _i-umlaut_ of an original 'o' (in words from Greek it merely represents ancient Greek 'oi'). I assume the name 'Goethe' derives from the same root as 'Goth', and is the result of i-umlaut. I think there may be some confusion in terminoly. 'umlaut' is properly used to describe the modification of a root vowel conditioned by anticipating the vocalism of a suffix, particularly if the latter is then dropped, e.g. protoGermanic *f=F8:t (feet) <-- *f=F8:t <-- fot:ti. That is an example of i-umlaut, i.e. umlaut conditioned by an original final -i which is now lost in all the modern Germanic langs. Welsh has many examples of both i-umlaut & a-umlaut; Old Norse has examples of i-umlaut & u-umlaut (Does it also have a-umlaut? I wasn't aware of it) - i.e. vowels modified by anticpating a final -a or -u which was subsequently lost. But - 'umlaut' is often used also to describe the two dots placed over modified vowels in German (I've even heard the 'e' in the French 'No=EBl' called 'e-umlaut'!). In that usage, of course, we have "a-umlaut", "o-umlaut" & "u-umlaut" in German - but they are _all_ examples of i-umlaut. I'd prefer to called the written forms 'umlauted a', 'umlauted o' etc. - but I guess purists would object to putting an English suffix onto a German word :=3D( AFAIK umlaut - in the phonological sense - is caused only by anticipating vowels at the vertices of the vocalic triangle. Indeed, it's difficult to see why mid vowels should trigger such a modification. Ray. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D A mind which thinks at its own expense will always interfere with language. [J.G. Hamann 1760] =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D