| From: | Luís Henrique <luisb@...> |
|---|---|
| Date: | Friday, February 2, 2001, 16:50 |
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001 01:09:35 +0100, =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rg?= Rhiemeier <joerg.rhiemeier@...> wrote:>_Viri_ is understandable, from >thinking it's an o-stem, but whence the second _i_ in _virii_? This >would require an underlying singular form _**virius_.How would be "vir" (male human being) be declensed? Luís Henrique