Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: CHAT: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)

From:Patrick Dunn <tb0pwd1@...>
Date:Monday, February 5, 2001, 20:31
Why stope there?  English has declensiones too.  Bringe them back!  In
facte, why not ussan tha articlos definitos of Olde Englishe?  It woulde
beon much easier than guessing which casam a nomen is in.  Then, we coulde
havan thone free word ordorem, and poesis coulde beon more interesantus.

Ah, shit, I don't knowan if half of thisse is right or not.  It's likest a
conlang.

On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Padraic Brown wrote:

> On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Patrick Dunn wrote: > > >*grins* If we were truly pedantic, we would require that all words of > >Latin derivation be declined properly in the English sentence of which > >they are a part. > > > >"So I took my penem. . . . " "He is such an ignorat." (okay, still not > >right, but what do you expect?) "I came to the conclusion from this > >piece of dati." > > To be pedantic, "of" preceeds the dative/accusative, so "... of dato." > And don't forget "...to the conclusione..." :) > > > > >Wouldn't that be fun? hehehe > > > > Ah, but you should also do the same for Graecis words; and would > have to differentiare words borrowed from Old, Middle or Nova > Frankisca _and_ have to declinare them prope... > > For what it's worth, the Romani seem to have done this at least to > an extense with Graeca words, as most Latin gramaires have paragraphos > on all the words declinata in Graeca (musice, etc.). > > Urk. My Old French and Anglo-Norman aren't what they should be for > this exercise! > > Padraic. >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Living your life is a task so difficult, it has never been attempted before.