Re: CHAT: Worse Greek 102 (was: Bad Latin 101)
From: | Patrick Dunn <tb0pwd1@...> |
Date: | Monday, February 5, 2001, 20:31 |
Why stope there? English has declensiones too. Bringe them back! In
facte, why not ussan tha articlos definitos of Olde Englishe? It woulde
beon much easier than guessing which casam a nomen is in. Then, we coulde
havan thone free word ordorem, and poesis coulde beon more interesantus.
Ah, shit, I don't knowan if half of thisse is right or not. It's likest a
conlang.
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Padraic Brown wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Patrick Dunn wrote:
>
> >*grins* If we were truly pedantic, we would require that all words of
> >Latin derivation be declined properly in the English sentence of which
> >they are a part.
> >
> >"So I took my penem. . . . " "He is such an ignorat." (okay, still not
> >right, but what do you expect?) "I came to the conclusion from this
> >piece of dati."
>
> To be pedantic, "of" preceeds the dative/accusative, so "... of dato."
> And don't forget "...to the conclusione..." :)
>
> >
> >Wouldn't that be fun? hehehe
> >
>
> Ah, but you should also do the same for Graecis words; and would
> have to differentiare words borrowed from Old, Middle or Nova
> Frankisca _and_ have to declinare them prope...
>
> For what it's worth, the Romani seem to have done this at least to
> an extense with Graeca words, as most Latin gramaires have paragraphos
> on all the words declinata in Graeca (musice, etc.).
>
> Urk. My Old French and Anglo-Norman aren't what they should be for
> this exercise!
>
> Padraic.
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Living your life is a task so difficult,
it has never been attempted before.