Re: Nine (was: Re: Back)
From: | Vasiliy Chernov <bc_@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, July 19, 2000, 19:17 |
On Tue, 18 Jul 2000 23:59:04 GMT, Oskar Gudlaugsson <hr_oskar@...>
wrote:
>> Okay, I'm confused again. How many people are working on "the same
project",
>> or that is, different projects with the same premises? Rob, Nicole, and
also
>> Joe? Any more? Should I make a 'Nine' too :)?
- Yes, please! I've just did (see another thread) :)
On Tue, 18 Jul 2000 20:46:08 -0400, nicole perrin <nicole.eap@...>
wrote:
>Go right ahead, if you like! But first, allow me to clarify:
>Nine is a project proposed a few months ago by Danny Wier. Rob and I
>both decided to pursue it. Joe's new lang, on the other hand, is
>totally separate -- the only connection is that [n] has the same
>allophones in Joe's and Rob's langs. BTW, my version of Nine has a name
>-- it's called Ini, and I posted a short sketch as well as a Babel text
>to the list.
- A nice company of phonemic minimalists! Anybody going to join it?
I think the requirements are: ten or less phonemes plus a typologically
plausible surface phonetics. Corrections?
Basilius