Re: Afrasian?
From: | Tim May <butsuri@...> |
Date: | Thursday, October 10, 2002, 19:09 |
Andreas Johansson writes:
>
> But I'm not having any megalomanic dreams of changing geographic
> terminology. The question was rather intended to probe whether you thought
> it could be a good name in a more perfect world. Thou evidently dost not.
> (That said, someone must've coined Eurasia, and it probably sounded weird at
> first, too.)
>
Eurasia's one of the three superstates in 1984 by George Orwell. Does
anyone know if this is the origin of the term?
I certainly think it would be useful to have a term for the landmass
as a whole, but I'm not entirely satisfied with Eurasica. For one
thing, Europe gets three unique letters*, and Africa only one.
I wonder... is it possible to run the lojban gismu generation
algorithm on the three words as if they were terms for the same thing
in different languages? Of course, that would give us a 5 letter term
conforming to lojban morphology, which wouldn't be recognizable, but
it might be interesting.
* Or 2, depending on how you look at it, but there's definitely a
stronger suggestion of Europe than Africa.