From: | Tim May <butsuri@...> |
---|---|
Date: | Friday, August 23, 2002, 21:42 |
John Cowan writes: > Christopher Wright scripsit: > > > How plausible is it for tones to have a grammatical rather than lexical > > meaning? For instance, where many languages have articles, this one would > > have different tones instead. Or perhaps verb number or tense would be > > indicated thus. > > I asked this very question on Linguist List ten years ago (wow!), thus: > > http://www.linguistlist.org/issues/3/3-341.html#1 > > And here's my summary of replies: > > http://www.linguistlist.org/issues/3/3-374.html#2 > Is anyone archiving this kind of thing in preparation for the long-awaited second integration of the conlang FAQ? It seems in keeping with the contents of (what has been archived of) the old site. http://web.archive.org/web/20010804085227/personalweb.sierra.net/~spynx/FAQ/
Peter Clark <peter-clark@...> | Conlang FAQ was Re: Grammatical tones |