Re: going without "without"
From: | Padraic Brown <pbrown@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, August 17, 1999, 23:08 |
On Tue, 17 Aug 1999, John Cowan wrote:
> Irina Rempt-Drijfhout wrote:
>
> > Better; much better, even though it goes against the school-grammar
> > rule that the verb should always be negated if anything else in the
> > sentence is.
>
> Say what? "None of us are going to the store" negates, but not the
> verb. *"All of us aren't going to the store" is absolutely impossible
> in English, thanks to the rule of negative attraction.
How is it absolutely impossible? I take it to mean some of us are going
to the store, others are not.
Padraic.
>
> --
> John Cowan
http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org
> Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! / Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau,
> Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau / Und trank die Milch vom Paradies.
> -- Coleridge / Politzer
>