Re: Creative ways to form relative clauses?
From: | caeruleancentaur <caeruleancentaur@...> |
Date: | Saturday, December 20, 2008, 15:32 |
> Daniel Bowman <danny.c.bowman@...> wrote:
> How do your conlangs handle this type of construction? Any
> creative (read: non-English and Romance language) ways to handle
> this?
Senjecas is SOV. It is my understanding that in this type of language
all modifiers are placed before what is modified; it also uses
postpositions. I'm sorry I can't quote my source(s), there have been
so many. This is how it is done in Senjecas:
In place of a relative pronoun, Senjecas uses a relativizer, "jet-."
When used as a pronoun, it is declined in the appropriate class,
e.g., "jetus," who; "jetos," what; "jetusyo," whose. When used as
the object of a postposition the relativizer is suffixed with the
appropriate postpostion: "jetafa," off of which; "jeþkemta,"
alongside of which; "jetena," at which, where, etc.
I hate the man who hit me yesterday.
m-us jet-us m-um jhes-aamr-ëvi per paalg-a mhir-um tsed-a.
I-NM.sg who-NM.sg I-AC.sg yester-day-ADV PAST hit-IND man-ACC.sg hate-
IND
Charlie
Replies