Re: Terkunan revision (adding a lot of Rhodrese)
From: | Andreas Johansson <andjo@...> |
Date: | Thursday, October 11, 2007, 20:34 |
Quoting Benct Philip Jonsson <conlang@...>:
> Philip Newton skrev:
> > On 10/11/07, Douglas Koller <laokou@...> wrote:
> >> How to deal with "which" when it refers to the entire
> >> previous clause (in French, "ce qui"):
> >>
> >> He arrived late, which annoyed me. Il est arrivé en
> >> retard, ce qui m'a embêté.
> >>
> >> How does German deal here? was? Swedish? vad?
> >
> > German indeed has "was".
> >
> > "Er ist zu spät gekommen, was mich sehr gestört hat."
> > Though I'd find it more natural to say "Er ist zu spät
> > gekommen, und das hat mich sehr gestört" (..., and that
> > annoyed me), which incidentally side-steps the problem.
>
> In Swedish you can use _vilket_: "Han kom försent, vilket
> störde mig mycket", but it's very "skriftspråkligt" --
> officialese rather than literary. As in German it is much
> more natural to use "och det störde mig mycket".
I suppose my speech tends to "skriftspråklighet" in general, but the
construction with _vilket_* feels the more natural to me.
* Pronounced [v\Ik@t], or thereabouts.
Andreas