Re: number marking
From: | iisem :P <iisem@...> |
Date: | Friday, December 17, 1999, 0:47 |
In a message dated 12/16/99 4:08:31 PM Mountain Standard Time,=20
jmpearson@FACSTAFF.WISC.EDU writes:
> Last night, while I was dreaming my little dreamy dreams, I
> suddenly hit on an interesting way of expressing number, which
> I might use in a sketch for a new conlang that I've been working
> on.
man i'd love to have dreams like you! heh heh An=ECes=E9 would have been=20
finished long ago! heh heh
> Nouns have up to three forms:
we've three as well: (*scratches head* as far as i remember. i haven't=20
touched it for a while now... sigh, no time. shame on me, i should have=20
made it)
singular, dual, trial-multiple.
(snip!)
> Another possibility I'm exploring would be to have different
> definite singular and plural suffixes for different semantic classes
> (e.g. one for humans, one for animals, one for round things, etc.),
> which would drag the system closer to a Chinese-style classifier
> system...
=20
> What do you think?
i dig the idea of the different plural modifiers for the different cases. =20
i've been playing with that idea in a new lang of mine too, adds flavour :)=20=
=20
what is the word order? i'm assuming, V-medial, or V-finial, no? the words=
=20
taste great too!=20
fantastic start! if you keep dreamin' you'll be done in no time! heh heh
oel oushean!
iisem
http://members.aol.com/iisem/door.html