Re: No plural morpheme
From: | caeruleancentaur <caeruleancentaur@...> |
Date: | Sunday, November 25, 2007, 18:39 |
>caeruleancentaur <caeruleancentaur@...> wrote:
>Senjecas has a collective suffix -ijos: âros, nut; arîjos, mast. I
>could broaden the meaning as in Taroo-tachi: mheðmhîrus, bridegroom;
>mhéðmhirîjos, sons of the bridegroom. At least, in this case, it
>works. A meeting of bridegrooms is a little far-fetched!
While driving to Mass this morning, I was thinking about what I had
written earlier this morning, the above. I realized that I had made a
minor mistake.
-os is the declension for perceivable objects, so 'âros, nut; arîjos,
mast' is correct.
However, -us is the declension for loquent beings, so 'mhéðmhirîjos'
should be 'mhéðmhirîjus.'
Charlie
--- End forwarded message ---