Re: barred-h

>         I already know that. It's the Gregorian calendar,
> the one we already use and the one that will cause the year
> 2000 not to be a bissextile year (problem that leads to a
> second Y2K bug on the 1st of March 2000, as many computers
> will think they are the 29th of February). What I need is
> the exact length of the year to build my own calendar which
> will be different. Thank you in advance.
Well, year 2000 is indeed a lap year, while 1900 was not and 2100 won't.

I have the datum of 365.256 days for year.  Just six significant figures
but I hope it helps.

-- Carlos Th