From: | Mark J. Reed <markjreed@...> |
---|---|
Date: | Sunday, January 8, 2006, 17:19 |
On 1/7/06, Paul Bennett <paul-bennett@...> wrote:> I read "nearest" as "next", which actually made fairly decent sense in > contextAnd of course, the two words are etymologically identical, so that was no error at all - at least not synchronically. ;-) -- Mark J. Reed <markjreed@...>