Marcus wrote:
> > Okay then. I'm gonna break the MP real bad! :)
> Good for you. :)
Hmm. Just a thought on the expression "Good for you". We have a
similar expression in Swedish which is "Kul för dig". But the
meaning is something like "Good for you. Myself, I couldn't care
less." But, apparently in America, it's actually a positive and
appreciating comment. It's hard to get used to that.
> > Yeah, I see your point. I'm sure we'll see your name in an article in
> > "Language" when you manage to solve it. :)
> I think I have. I just need to talk to my local Chickasaw expert about
> my analysis to see what she thinks.
Now I've seen a photo of her and Pam. She looks _really_ cool!
Not at all what I'd expected.
It would be way cool to see your name in an article get-at-able at
my uni library. Are there many people on this list which have been
published in any linguistic journals? It would be fun to read those
papers then.
> Hmm. Actually, I'm an anti-Chomskyan, in that I really disagree with
> Chomsky himself, not his basic approach. I guess it would have been
> better to say the anti-structuralists or anti-theorists wouldn't like
> my explanation.
Hi there! :) ... I think I would like your explanation, still.
Daniel