Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

"organic/non-organicintelligencegender"<wasRe:Ladanandwoman's speak>

From:Tom Wier <artabanos@...>
Date:Sunday, June 4, 2000, 5:01
Nik Taylor wrote:

> Besides, I have > a hard time imagining the designers of an auxlang deliberately putting > in gender.
Why? If you're creating a constructed language, what's the difference between giving the conlang a case system or grammaticalized possessive pronouns and giving it gender categories? =========================================== Tom Wier <artabanos@...> "Cogito ergo sum, sed credo ergo ero." ===========================================