"organic/non-organicintelligencegender"<wasRe:Ladanandwoman's speak>
From: | Tom Wier <artabanos@...> |
Date: | Sunday, June 4, 2000, 5:01 |
Nik Taylor wrote:
> Besides, I have
> a hard time imagining the designers of an auxlang deliberately putting
> in gender.
Why? If you're creating a constructed language, what's the difference
between giving the conlang a case system or grammaticalized possessive
pronouns and giving it gender categories?
===========================================
Tom Wier <artabanos@...>
"Cogito ergo sum, sed credo ergo ero."
===========================================